Tuesday, June 28, 2011

The First Movie Ever Made

A few weeks ago we were talking about movies (real shocker there huh?) and I overheard my daughter asking my mom what the first movie ever made was.  My mom didn't know and neither did I.  So after thinking about it and first remembering and then forgetting to look it up, I finally sat down today and did just that.

What I found out was interesting!  And a little bit confusing.  (I'm pretty sure I have all my facts straight, but if you find out something different please let me know as there was a lot of info to sort out.)

First up, the Praxinoscope.

Charles-Emile Reynaud was a French science teacher and was responsible for the first projected animated cartoon films.  Reynaud created the Praxinoscope in 1877.  The praxinoscope was an animation device, the successor to the zoetrope.  Like the zoetrope, it used a strip of pictures placed around the inner surface of a spinning cylinder.  The praxinoscope improved on the zoetrope by replacing its narrow viewing slits with an inner circle of mirrors, placed so that the reflections of the pictures appeared more or less stationary in a position as the wheel turned.  Someone looking in the mirrors would therefore see a rapid succession of images producing the illusion of motion, with a brighter and less distorted picture than the zoetrope offered.  In 1892 Reynaud projected the first animated film in public, called Pauvre Pierrot (aka Poor Pete) using the Theatre Optique, an improved version capable of projecting images on a screen from a longer roll of pictures.  Reynaud is the first to use perforated strips.  This allowed him to show hand drawn animated cartoons to larger audiences.  It was however soon eclipsed by the photographic film projector of the Lumière Brothers.

But we'll get to them in a minute.

First we have to talk about the Kinetoscope.

The Kinetoscope is an early motion picture exhibition device. Though not a movie projector—it was designed for films to be viewed individually through the window of a cabinet housing its components—the Kinetoscope introduced the basic approach that would become the standard for all cinematic projection before the advent of video: it creates the illusion of movement by conveying a strip of perforated film bearing sequential images over a light source with a high-speed shutter. First described in conceptual terms by U.S. inventor Thomas Edison in 1888, it was largely developed by his employee William Kennedy Laurie Dickson between 1889 and 1892. Dickson and his team at the Edison lab also devised the Kinetograph, an innovative motion picture camera with rapid intermittent, or stop-and-go, film movement, to photograph movies for in-house experiments and, eventually, commercial Kinetoscope presentations.  The trial, or camera test, of the kinetoscope was a series of movies called Monkeyshines.  Monkeyshines, No. 1 may very well be the first movie ever shot using a continuous strip of film.

We now come back to Auguste and Louis Lumière.

It was not until 1892 that the brothers began to create moving pictures. They patented a number of significant processes leading up to their film camera - most notably film perforations (originally implemented by Emile Reynaud) as a means of advancing the film through the camera and projector. The cinématographe itself was patented on February 13, 1895 and the first footage ever to be recorded using it was recorded on March 19, 1895. This first film shows workers leaving the Lumière factory.  The Lumières held their first private screening of projected motion pictures in 1895.  Their first public screening of films at which admission was charged was held on December 28, 1895, at Salon Indien du Grand Café in Paris. This history-making presentation featured ten short films, including their first film, Sortie des Usines Lumière à Lyon (Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory).  Each film is 17 meters long, which, when hand cranked through a projector, runs approximately 50 seconds.  It is believed their first film was actually recorded that same year (1895) with Léon Bouly's cinématographe device, which was patented the previous year. The cinématographe — a three-in-one device that could record, develop, and project motion pictures — was further developed by the Lumières. 

Though there were many other early cinematographers, film historians consider the Grande Café screening to be the true birth of the cinema as a commercial medium.

As interesting as all this might be (well to me at least) it doesn't really answer what the first movie ever made was.

So let's change it up.

The Great Train Robbery is a 1903 American action Western film by Edwin S. Porter. Twelve minutes long, it is considered a milestone in film making, expanding on Porter's previous work Life of an American Fireman. The film used a number of innovative techniques including cross cutting, double exposure composite editing, camera movement and on location shooting. Cross-cuts were a new, sophisticated editing technique. Some prints were also hand colored in certain scenes. None of the techniques were original to The Great Train Robbery, and it is now considered that it was heavily influenced by Frank Mottershaw's earlier British film A Daring Daylight Burglary

The Great Train Robbery is considered to be the first real full length movie - the first narrative Western film with a storyline - and the first real smash hit.

The movie was directed and photographed by Edwin S. Porter, a former Edison Studios cameraman. Actors in the movie included Alfred C. Abadie, "Broncho" Billy Anderson and Justus D. Barnes, although there were no credits. Though a Western, it was filmed in Milltown, New Jersey.

So, there you have it. The Great Train Robbery could be considered the first real "movie" ever made.  I think...

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Movie Review- Black Swan


Years ago when Myspace was THE thing, I filled out my personal profile and when it asked about movies, I said I'd, "Watch anything. I mean anything. Sometimes I regret that."

In my Christian walk I am terrible about the content I put in my brain when it comes to movies.  I really do watch just about anything and there are times where I wish I could get back the 2 hours of my life that I just wasted.  Such was the case Monday night....

I've been debating for MONTHS if I really wanted to see Black Swan or not.  I had heard that it was a crazy movie and that there was a lot of sexual stuff.  But I'd also heard that the dancing was really good and being a former ballerina who happens to love the ballet Swan Lake, I was excited to see that part.

I decided that I'd go ahead and see the film because I already knew about all the "bad" stuff and really, how much worse could it be seeing it, rather than just reading about it?

It was way worse.

Natalie Portman stars as 20-something Nina, the perfect little ballerina, who still lives in her childlike pink bedroom in the same house with bizarre-o mommy, played by Barbara Hershey.  After years of toiling in her ballet company, she gets the starring role in Swan Lake and it's all downhill from there.  Where as Nina is perfect to play the part of the delicate White Swan, Princess Odette - she's not suited to the more demanding role of the seductive Black Swan Odile and it's tradition that one ballerina plays both parts.  Convinced that the new girl Lily, played by Mila Kunis, is out to steal her role, Nina's mind slowly breaks as she becomes more and more in touch with her dark side to be the Black Swan.  It all comes to a head when Nina goes postal on herself in a strange twist of psychotic-ness.

Now I can handle girl-gone-crazy.  It's a Darren Aronfsky film and he doesn't do much that's tame - so I knew Black Swan would be "out there."  It's the girl-on-girl sexual action and all the other sexual innuendo's and such that were way worse than I thought it would be.  That I dislike.

To top it all off the dancing was sub-par.  There has been a huge amount of controversy about the use of dance doubles and who did what.  Though Natalie Portman does mostly all of her own dancing, American Ballet Theatre professional ballerina Sarah Lane acted as body and dance double.  These doubles shots involve complex en pointe work (fouettes, pique turns) and virtually all camera shots that focus below the waist on Nina's legs and feet.  There are 139 dance shots in the film.  Out of the 139, 111 are untouched shots of Natalie Portman and the remaining 28 are her dance double, Sarah Lane.  Of the shots in which Lane is featured, 26 of the 28 are wide shots and rarely appear on screen longer than one second.  The two remaining shots required digital face replacement so the audience sees Portman's face instead of Lane's.  The problem with this is that the film mostly focuses on Nina's face.  There isn't much that IS focused on her legs and feet.  I was really disappointed.

The one redeeming feature of the movie is that it's a great film. For all it's craziness, I thought the script was well written and the cinematography was awesome - a lot of close up facial shots a la Hitchcock.  And the acting was superb.  Ms. Portman really did deserve her Best Actress award at the Oscar's this year.

I still don't recommend seeing it unless you have a strong tolerance for well... a lot.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Original, A Musical & The Remake

Two of my favorite movies are The King and I (the 1956 musical) and Anna and the King (the 1999 remake.)  I didn't find out till today however that there is a third movie - the original - Anna and the King of Siam, done in 1946.  All three movies are based on the 1870 book The English Governess at the Siamese Court - written by English governess Anna Leonowens, a widow with two children. Based on her 6 years as a governess for the 64 children of King Rama IV (or King Mongkut) the book was a huge hit and a second volume of stories of her time in Siam was published in 1872 as The Romance of the Harem.  Unfortunately the "true story" presented in the movies has been denounced for its inaccuracies by the current government of Thailand.  When Mrs. Leonowens published her first book it is said that the King of Siam responded with the statement that she "has supplied by her invention that which is deficient in her memory."  So I see the movies as a little bit of fact, mixed with a lot of fiction.

Here are some fun facts about all 3 movies!


(no preview available)
Anna and the King of Siam
1946
Irene Dunne as Anna Owens
Rex Harrison as King Mongkut

This movie (as well as the 1999 version) was banned in Thailand because of what the Thai government said were historical inaccuracies about the King of Siam.

Rex Harrison's first American movie.

In the film, Linda Darnell (who plays Tuptim) - her character dies by being burned at the stake (in the subsequent versions, Tuptim is beheaded.)  This was a particularly difficult sequence for Darnell to film as she was terrified of fire.  What makes this a double irony is the fact that, 19 years later, she was killed in a house fire.


The King and I
1956
Deborah Kerr as Anna Leonowens
Yul Brynner as King Mongkut

Deborah Kerr's gowns each weighed between 30 and 40 pounds, due to all the pleats, hoops and petticoats.  And baking under the hot lights on set, Kerr lost over 12 pounds and would often refer to herself as "The melting Miss Kerr."

Marni Nixon dubbed Deborah Kerr's singing in the film.  Nixon was hired on a six week contract and she was to be at the studio every day that Kerr rehearsed a scene with a song in it.  Nixon would actually stand next to Kerr and walk through the whole scene - both of them singing - and Nixon would be looking closely at Kerr's facial expressions to try to imitate her speech pattern in the songs.  Nixon said that she realized the keys of Anna's songs were very low for her - "very contralto keys" - and that she was really too young (just 21) to be able to sound "adult" and "womanly."  Hence, a modifier was placed in Nixon's microphone to make her voice sound deeper and more mature.  Nixon said she also had a terrible cold at the time and that probably helped in matching Kerr's voice.

Marni Nixon was the voice double for many movies.  
An Affair to Remember, character Terry McKay's singing voice (Terry McKay was played by Deborah Kerr)
West Side Story, character Maria's (played by Natalie Wood) singing voice
My Fair Lady, character Eliza Doolittle's (played by Audrey Hepburn) singing voice
The Sound of Music, Nixon plays Sister Sophia 

The reality of the "Shall We Dance" sequence was that Deborah Kerr suffered continual bruising from the hoops in her skirt and Yul Brynner - a chain smoker who had already lost a lung to his habit - had to take oxygen in between takes.

Yul Brynner won the 1952 Tony ward for Supporting or Features Actor in a Musical for "The King and I" as the King of Siam and recreated his role in the movie version.  Brynner is also the only man to have played a lead role in a Rodgers and Hammerstein production both on the stage and on the screen.

In real life the King died of malaria, not a broken spirit as portrayed in the movie.

1999
Jodie Foster as Anna Leonowens
Chow Yun-Fat as King Mongkut

This version was filmed in Malaysia due to the fact that Thailand still felt that it was historically inaccurate and refused to let them film on location in the country.

Bai Ling completely shaved her head bald for her role as Tuptim.

If you turn on the French audio track on the DVD, you can hear Jodie Foster dubbing her own character's voice.

The real King Mongkut was paralyzed on one half of his face, a fact that has apparently been dropped from the movies.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Movie Review- The Brothers Bloom


Starring Adrien Brody (The Thin Red Line, The Village, Academy Award winner for best actor in The Pianist) as "Bloom" and Mark Ruffalo (View from the Top, 13 Going on 30, The Kids Are All Right) as "Stephen" - it's a story of brothers who have been con artists since they were little!  After years in the business Bloom wants out, but Stephen ropes him in for one more con.  Bring in Rachel Weisz (The Mummy, Enemy at the Gates, About a Boy) as "Penelope" the eccentric, bored heiress they are out to dupe.  As they travel around the world you never know what is real and what is make-believe! With a supporting cast consisting of Robbie Coltrane, Maxmilian Schell and Rinko Kikuchi who stars as "Bang Bang" the brother's primarily silent explosions expert, this is a tale that keeps you guessing.

Undoubtedly one of the quirkiest movies I've ever seen, I nevertheless laughed almost all the way through!  

Rated PG-13 for violence (just a bit,) some sensuality (yeah, there's a short scene or two that was unnecessary) and brief strong language (very brief.) 

Fun Trivia-
Rachel Weisz learned how to play the piano, violin, accordion, the banjo, to break-dance, juggle, do karate, play Ping-Pong, ride a unicycle and even skateboard for her role as the eccentric Penelope.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

The Year of the Comic...

...Comic BOOK that is.  I knew there were a few movies based on comics coming out this year, but when I looked them all up I was surprised at how many there actually are!

I know nothing about comics.  Lucky for me I married a guy who, when he moved in, came with an entire trunk full of comic books.

When a movie based on a comic comes out, I've learned to NOT ask questions.  (Questions like, are the characters in the movie same as the ones in the comic book or is the story accurate?)  Because IF I do, I get a back story so involved, it'd make your head spin.  I was watching the previews for some of the movies posted below and Jason watched Priest with me.  After it was done, he walked away muttering, "That's not the Priest I remember."

I didn't even know Priest was a comic....

For your viewing pleasure I present previews for the entire 2011 list of comic-books-turned-into-movies (plus my comments, because I have to comment!)

Enjoy!

January 14 - The Green Hornet
This is out on DVD already I do believe.  I've heard it's not bad!


May 6 - Thor
'Cause who doesn't want to see a smokin' hot Aussie in a movie? Well... I mean what chick doesn't want to see that...

May 13 - Priest
Because we really need another vampire movie...

I liked the first set of X-Men movies. I dislike that they have to do all of these prequels to movies. (Though I must admit... the Star Trek prequel was pretty darn good!)

June 17 - Green Lantern
I thought this preview looked stupid.  There was no comment from Jason.

I look forward to seeing who they got to replace Megan Fox.

I thought this looked a lot better than The Green Lantern!

As I've said before... Daniel Craig AND Harrison Ford in a movie. I'm there.

Why? What in the world made them think to remake this film...

What's at Liberty...

What's at Liberty?
Friday, May 6th - Tuesday, May 10th



SOOO excited this is in town!  I've read nothing but rave reviews and heard nothing but praise for this movie!!!

Rated PG for an intense accident sequence and some thematic material
106 minutes


Liberty starts new hours this Friday!!!

Open Friday through Tuesday
Closed Wednesday and Thursday
Monday is Local's Night - all tickets $5 with a valid ID


Soul Surfer Times:
Friday- 6pm
Saturday- 6pm
Sunday- 1pm Mother's Day Special, all seats $5
Monday- Local's Night, all seats $5 w/ valid ID
Wednesday- SPECIAL EVENT at 6pm - Youth Appreciation Night, all seats $5 (sponsored by local churches)
Thursday- closed

Monday, April 4, 2011

Life...

No, I've not lost the password to the blog, nor have I forgotten how to type... I've just been very busy over the last month.

I do see some time to sit and reflect coming my way.  Probably has something to do with the fact that I'm 34 weeks pregnant and was just put on bed rest...

I have a lot of time to sit and do nothing.

My kids are home for Spring Break this week, so I might not have as much time as I think to be able to post.  But next week - if baby doesn't make an appearance this weekend - I will definitely try to catch up.

I foresee having something to blog about "Tangled."  Considering I've seen it twice in 3 days and the girls are home for the rest of the week, I'm sure we'll be watching it at least once or twice... probably at least three times more.  It's cute, so I don't mind.  I do however keep getting the songs stuck in my head and that is slightly annoying as I don't know all the words... yet...

For now though I'm signing off.  Hopefully it won't take me another month to get back...